The summaries of New York Times articles on the front page are sometimes wildly off the mark, like the summary for this one:
UPDATE (7/21, 10:44 AM): It seems the Times web editors have had a change of heart:
Categories:
1 Comment
Categories
- Academy (85)
- Advertising (8)
- Africa (1)
- Art (6)
- Automobiles (27)
- Aviation (10)
- Barter (4)
- Blogs (46)
- Books & Reviews (86)
- Businesses (73)
- Competition (65)
- Corruption (41)
- Crime
- Culture (230)
- Data (92)
- Defense (4)
- Deletions from a Dissertation (5)
- Econ and Project Management (1)
- Economic Reform (50)
- Economics (71)
- Economists (44)
- Education (37)
- Electronic markets (9)
- Energy (20)
- Environment (20)
- Events & Conferences (9)
- Finance (22)
- Food (11)
- Forecasting (8)
- Gambling (12)
- Gaming (13)
- Globalization (50)
- Health (62)
- Hearsay (4)
- History (46)
- Humor (57)
- IPE (1)
- Immigration (3)
- Incentives (37)
- Income (1)
- Informal Institutions (10)
- Information (10)
- Interesting Academic Papers (5)
- Internation Money & Finance
- International Money & Finance (2)
- Iraq (78)
- Islam (35)
- Labor Markets (13)
- Law (1)
- Macroeconomics (49)
- Maldives (112)
- Maths/Stats (4)
- Military (5)
- Multi-Media (170)
- Natural Resources (8)
- Personal (28)
- Personal Productivity (8)
- Philanthropy (6)
- Philosophy (7)
- Politics (39)
- Pricing (23)
- Product Reviews (12)
- Real Estate (28)
- Recession (1)
- Regulation (41)
- Reports & Books (17)
- Retail
- Russia is NOT a Normal Country (12)
- Science (30)
- Special Notices (40)
- Sports (26)
- Statsmerkwürdigkeiten (20)
- Switzerland (1)
- Taxation (10)
- Technology (54)
- Terrifying Poverty (14)
- Things Economists Do (35)
- Tourism & Leisure (13)
- Trade (18)
- Transparency & Governance (15)
- Urban Economics (8)
- Voting (18)
Monthly Archives
- November 2011 (1)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (3)
- November 2008 (8)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (7)
- January 2008 (16)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (8)
- October 2007 (6)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (3)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (14)
- February 2007 (3)
- January 2007 (21)
- December 2006 (15)
- November 2006 (85)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (111)
- August 2006 (85)
- July 2006 (75)
- June 2006 (99)
- May 2006 (71)
- April 2006 (37)
- March 2006 (39)
- February 2006 (23)
- January 2006 (21)
- December 2005 (4)
- November 2005 (21)
- October 2005 (22)
- September 2005 (23)
- August 2005 (19)
- July 2005 (33)
- June 2005 (33)
- May 2005 (36)
- April 2005 (40)
- March 2005 (37)
- February 2005 (31)
- January 2005 (43)
- December 2004 (50)
- November 2004 (51)
- October 2004 (45)
- September 2004 (20)
- August 2004 (40)
- July 2004 (19)
- June 2004 (48)
- May 2004 (53)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Kevin published on July 20, 2004 10:54 PM.
Regarding T&B Traffic and Bandwidth was the previous entry in this blog.
Iran Learning Lessons From China? is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
I say yes. That way I can write off all my trades as charitable donations on my tax returns. If I buy bad stock, at least I get a break at the end of the year. And imagine the inspiration people would have to start investing. The whole darn country might be invested in the market! And then it'll be "too big to fail!" After all, that idea kept people confident in Enron, right?
The more I think about it, the better that idea gets...