5 Comments
Categories
- Academy (85)
- Advertising (8)
- Africa (1)
- Art (6)
- Automobiles (27)
- Aviation (10)
- Barter (4)
- Blogs (46)
- Books & Reviews (86)
- Businesses (73)
- Competition (65)
- Corruption (41)
- Crime
- Culture (230)
- Data (92)
- Defense (4)
- Deletions from a Dissertation (5)
- Econ and Project Management (1)
- Economic Reform (50)
- Economics (71)
- Economists (44)
- Education (37)
- Electronic markets (9)
- Energy (20)
- Environment (20)
- Events & Conferences (9)
- Finance (22)
- Food (11)
- Forecasting (8)
- Gambling (12)
- Gaming (13)
- Globalization (50)
- Health (62)
- Hearsay (4)
- History (46)
- Humor (57)
- IPE (1)
- Immigration (3)
- Incentives (37)
- Income (1)
- Informal Institutions (10)
- Information (10)
- Interesting Academic Papers (5)
- Internation Money & Finance
- International Money & Finance (2)
- Iraq (78)
- Islam (35)
- Labor Markets (13)
- Law (1)
- Macroeconomics (49)
- Maldives (112)
- Maths/Stats (4)
- Military (5)
- Multi-Media (170)
- Natural Resources (8)
- Personal (28)
- Personal Productivity (8)
- Philanthropy (6)
- Philosophy (7)
- Politics (39)
- Pricing (23)
- Product Reviews (12)
- Real Estate (28)
- Recession (1)
- Regulation (41)
- Reports & Books (17)
- Retail
- Russia is NOT a Normal Country (12)
- Science (30)
- Special Notices (40)
- Sports (26)
- Statsmerkwürdigkeiten (20)
- Switzerland (1)
- Taxation (10)
- Technology (54)
- Terrifying Poverty (14)
- Things Economists Do (35)
- Tourism & Leisure (13)
- Trade (18)
- Transparency & Governance (15)
- Urban Economics (8)
- Voting (18)
Monthly Archives
- November 2011 (1)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (3)
- November 2008 (8)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (7)
- January 2008 (16)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (8)
- October 2007 (6)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (3)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (14)
- February 2007 (3)
- January 2007 (21)
- December 2006 (15)
- November 2006 (85)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (111)
- August 2006 (85)
- July 2006 (75)
- June 2006 (99)
- May 2006 (71)
- April 2006 (37)
- March 2006 (39)
- February 2006 (23)
- January 2006 (21)
- December 2005 (4)
- November 2005 (21)
- October 2005 (22)
- September 2005 (23)
- August 2005 (19)
- July 2005 (33)
- June 2005 (33)
- May 2005 (36)
- April 2005 (40)
- March 2005 (37)
- February 2005 (31)
- January 2005 (43)
- December 2004 (50)
- November 2004 (51)
- October 2004 (45)
- September 2004 (20)
- August 2004 (40)
- July 2004 (19)
- June 2004 (48)
- May 2004 (53)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Bryan published on November 18, 2004 1:44 PM.
Sunday Shopping was the previous entry in this blog.
Does Technical Advancement Breed Disposability? is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Not that I would disagree with the assertion that academia tends to be liberal, but to point to the fact that faculty at STANFORD and UC-BERKELEY are overwhelmingly Democrat seems a little silly.
(I didn't read the whole paper, maybe they tried to control for the fact that the surrounding areas are mostly Democrat? See this [http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/ror/regstats_09-30-03.pdf] to get an idea of how liberal that area of California really is.)
At my orientation to Columbia in 1995, they assembled all the new students to listen to faulty. One prof gets up--it doesn't really matter who, does it?--and tells us with a slow articulation and emphasis--that Columbia "is a liberal institution," and, basically, that we'd better get used to it.
That was so pathetic, really.
When I told my mother-in-law that I would be attending Cornell for my PhD in economics, she told me that it would be an interesting change to be at a 'conservative' Ivy League school...I just chuckled and told her the conservative reputation was a 'bit' of myth.
Is it just me,or shouldn't the contrast be conservative vs socialist??
In response to the NY Times article VC references, there are several good letters to the editor today:
"Would it be surprising to find mostly Republicans among oil company executives? Simply ask what the population in question is trained and paid to do.
"Academics are trained to reason using logic, to question evidence and to consider and evaluate several possible interpretations of events. All these activities are discouraged and indeed ridiculed by the present Republican leadership.
"Academic Republicans must indeed suffer from this cognitive dissonance."
OR
"The view that campus collegiality leads to tyranny of the majority has some plausibility in explaining the absence of Republicans from academia, but the main causes clearly lie elsewhere.
"A successful career in academia, after all, requires willingness to be critical of yourself and to learn from experience, along with a lack of interest in material incentives. All these are antithetical to Republicanism as it has recently come to be."
OR
"Your article makes me wonder: Will conservatives now demand affirmative action in universities for themselves?"