Could bad weather be responsible for U.S. corruption?

Asks Peter T. Leeson and Russell S. Sobel in the following paper; Weathering Corruption

Abstract; Could bad weather be responsible for U.S. corruption? Natural disasters create resource windfalls in the states they strike by triggering federally-provided natural disaster relief. Like windfalls created by the .natural resource curse.and foreign aid, disaster relief windfalls may also increase corruption. We investigate this hypothesis by exploring the effect of FEMA-provided disaster relief on public corruption. The results support our hypothesis. Each additional $1 per capita in average annual FEMA relief increases corruption nearly 2.5 percent in the average state. Eliminating FEMA disaster relief would reduce corruption more than 20 percent in the average state. Our findings suggest that notoriously corrupt regions of the United States, such as the Gulf Coast, are notoriously corrupt because natural disasters frequently strike them. They attract more disaster relief making them more corrupt.


Disaster Relief: Type I & Type II Errors

May be report cards like this could help.


Powered by Movable Type 5.02

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul published on June 22, 2006 12:53 AM.

Martin Wolf on World Bank and Economic Reform in India was the previous entry in this blog.

The Most Courteous City in the World – New York? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.