Singapore, a heaven for corrupt cronies?

By Paul

In an earlier post I mentioned that Professor Acemoglu doesn’t think that Singapore is a democracy. The following article suggests the country’s financial sector also has serious flaws of transparency;

“Singapore finally agreed to negotiate an extradition treaty last year after years of Indonesia begging for one. The process has been ridiculously drawn out. At least six rounds of talks have been held. Indonesia is angry and feels that Singapore is being obstructionist. But why should Singapore be slow? Probably because it is a haven for Indonesian crooks on the run, and they bring their money with them. Billions of dollars in corruptly obtained funds have flowed into Singapore's property market and its banks.

It's a sensitive matter because financial services account for 22 per cent of Singapore's economy. You can imagine the situation from Jakarta's point of view. Singapore lectures Indonesia about the importance of the rule of law while giving its criminals a haven….

The US doesn't have an extradition treaty with Indonesia but co-operation by US officials saw the fugitive Indonesian David Nusa Wijaya, wanted in connection with embezzlement of about $US140 million, return to Indonesia from San Francisco earlier this year….

But that didn't stop India from signing such a treaty with the Philippines in 2004, or Australia from signing one with Indonesia. Fugitive Indonesian banker Hendra Rahardja, who embezzled almost $US300 million, was on the verge of being extradited from Australia in early 2003 when he died of cancer in Sydney. His funds in Australia were frozen and returned to Indonesia….

A corollary of Singapore's reluctance to sign an extradition treaty with Indonesia is its apparent lack of fussiness about the sources of the funds attracted to its banking sector…

Singaporean officials make all the right noises when it comes to monitoring illicit funds. But there is a perception that in practice Singapore is not fully meeting international expectations and obligations. One person involved in monitoring international money flows for a Western government told me last week that the results of Singapore's efforts to date were disappointing.

And a senior fund manager in the region had this to say: "Singapore has truly become the global centre for parking ill-gotten gains. The private banking teams are huge and in practice ask almost no questions (compared with the branches elsewhere, including Switzerland)…”

I’m interested to hear what the Singapore economist thinks of the issue. Singapore is a favorite place for Maldivian cronies; the second president of the country exiled himself to the country after according to some looting the state’s treasury and world’s longest serving foreign minister also ‘retired’ to the country.

Singapore has signed the UN Convention on Corruption though haven’t ratified it.

Related; Singapore to ban outdoor protests at IMF meeting

Some comments on the issue are at Singabloodypore.

Comments


John wrote:

Hmm...

While I won't seriously dispute the lack of 100% transparency in Singapore's financial regulations, I would take the original article, published in The Age, with a large grain of salt.

Do bear in mind that many Australians have an axe to grind with Singapore, and given the competitive nature of Australian media, it wouldn't be surprising to find that some "facts" have been twisted to portray Singapore in a very bad light.

-- August 8, 2006 12:04 AM


Post a comment